Utopia-The Unrealistic Ideal

An ideal society is at best a pipe dream. Utopian visions tend to neglect the realities of humanity. The world contains too many people with too many divergent ideas about what is good or moral or proper. What may appear to be ideal to a citizen of Bucyrus, Kansas would be foreign to a citizen of Agartala, India. The same ideal could be an anathema to a radical Islamic. Why this difficulty? C.S. Lewis (christian apologist, chair of Medieval and Renaissance Literature at Cambridge) shows in “Illustrations of the Tao” that there is a Natural Law that seems to be common to all civilizations. (Lewis, 1965)
To establish what I consider an ideal society I must first lay some ground rules, some axioms that pertain to any society. Firstly, the role of government. Let us turn to John Locke. “According to Lockeans, a political morality is rights-based and the proper role of the legitimate state is to protect rights and address rights violations.” (Hinman, 2006, p219) There is no distinction between races, ethnic groups, or religions. A society that bases its laws on the total or partial exclusion of any of these groups can in no way be considered ideal. What makes them correct? Secondly, the role of citizens. An ideal citizen must consider the rights of others. No crying movie in a crowded firehouse just to express your freedom of speech. (Do they show movies in crowded firehouses?) Can we do that? Of course the question arises, where do these ideals for our future society come from? It depends on whether there are any “universal” rules. To quote a famous Shakespeare line from Hamlet, “Aye, there’s the rub”. By adhering to these common laws, which basically fall back to the Golden Rule of Christianity, Buddhism, Jainism, and Confucianism among others, my ideal society would respect and appreciate the rights of others, would work together for the common good and actively seek justice. In seems as though all examples in the text deal almost exclusively with questions of race, reparations and reconciliation. Now these are important in themselves but are not an issue in my ideal society because the nature of its members renders the questions of race, gender, etc as non-existent. Can we achieve this goal? Now, there is one big problem, human nature. To achieve an ideal society one needs to change the human nature of all but saints. I am not holding my breath.

Resource List

Hinman, Lawrence M. Contemporary Moral Issues. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 2006. 219. Print.

Lewis, Clive S. The Abolition of Man. 7th ed. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1965. 95-121. Print.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Utopia-The Unrealistic Ideal

  1. w heisenberg says:

    The secret of life and therefore a perfect society is simple, to Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, body, and soul, and to love your neighbor as yourself. The problem lies in what each of us as individuals consider to be God. Be it Christ, Allah, money/wealth, sex. This contemplation is what turned me back to the truth. Because you will truly know them by their fruits.

  2. KenKasel says:

    Thank you for your kind words. I appreciate your thoughts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s